The information about the selling of coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five different nations is depicted by the rendered two tables. The data has been calibrated in millions of euros.
To begin with, in 1999, 1.5 and 3 million euros sales of coffee were in the UK and Switzerland. However, there had been drastic increase noticed after 5 years, it was increased by 18.5 and 3 correspondingly. Moreover, in Denmark and Sweden, there were 0.2 million euros of the positive difference in 2004, it was 2 and 1 in 2004. 1 million euros trading of coffee were in Belgium, in 1999 then it was rose by 0.7 until 2004.
Moving towards, in 1999, 15 million euros of trading of bananas were in Switzerland then a dramatic growth was seen in 2004, it comprised 47 million euros. Sweden and Denmark is the only nation where the trades of bananas were declined, which were decreased by 0.8 and 0.1 in 2004, which were 1 and 0.9. 1 and 0.6 million euros sales of bananas were in 1999 in the Uk and Belgium while there was a rapid increase observed, which were 5.5 and 4 in 2004 respectively.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the lowest amount of sales for coffee could be seen in Sweden and it was Denmark and Sweden where the lowest amount of bananas were sold in both years.
- Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal some people however think that other types of progress and equally important for a country 61
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively larger number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 61
- the diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features
- Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal some people however think that other types of progress and equally important for a country 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, then, while, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 7.0 314% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46610169492 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48495906315 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470338983051 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9929573972 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.111111111 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199388142364 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105021316773 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897804819508 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148435015044 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708727311507 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.