The charts depict the difference between the amount of sales of two products, coffee and bananas on two speperate years 1999 and 2004. Other than seperating the sales between two different years,
the amount sales of both the products, in 5 different countries(Uk, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium) are shown for both 1999 and 2004. The amounts shown in the charts are millions of euros.
Overall, we can observe that the sales for coffee shoot up between 1999 and 2004 for all the 5 countries. On the contrary, sales of bananas increased for 3 out of 5 countries with only
Sweden and Denmark being the exception.
For coffee, the sales surged the most in the UK, which was initially 1.5 million in 1999 and went up to 20 million in 2004. For the other countries, the amount of coffee bought in the market
also increased. For example: Switzerland had a sales increase of 3 million to 6 million, Denmark experienced a sales boom 0.2 million from 1.8 in 1999, Belgium also experienced an increase in
coffee consuption as sales inproved from 1 million to 1.7 million and lastly Sweden's sales for coffee also went up to 1 million from 0.8 million.
For bananas, sales rocketed to 47 million in 2004 from 15 million in 1999 in Swizerland. This was the largest increase between 1999 and 2004 for Bananas. Followed by an improvement of 4.5 million
between the time period of 1999 and 2004 for the UK, which was closely followed by an improvement in sales in Blgium from 0.6 million to 4 million. On the contrary, the market for bananas got worse for
both the countires of Sweden and Denmark which experienced a decrease in sales of 0.2 million and 1.1 million respectively.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 73
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the sales between two different years, the amount sales of both the products, i...
^^^
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased for 3 out of 5 countries with only Sweden and Denmark being the exception. ...
^^^
Line 8, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Belgium also experienced an increase in coffee consuption as sales inproved from...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t up to 1 million from 0.8 million. For bananas, sales rocketed to 47 million i...
^^^
Line 11, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ollowed by an improvement of 4.5 million between the time period of 1999 and 2004...
^^^
Line 12, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry, the market for bananas got worse for both the countires of Sweden and Denmark...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, so, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 291.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78006872852 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61201842675 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.415807560137 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5605318749 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.916666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 3.83414634146 261% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126683731454 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069750323588 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331729640476 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697933099387 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369247887169 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.