The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information

The tables reveal the data regarding sales of fairtrade from two products, coffee and bananas, in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

It is clear that both UK and Switzerland had the biggest revenue of fairtrade on those products in 2004. While the sales of fairtrade in all countries were increasing, the sales of bananas in Sweden and Denmark were dipping.

Denmark had the biggest sales of coffee in 1999 with 1.8 million of euros and slightly increased by 0.2 million of euroes in 2004. This trend was followed by Sweden. The sales of coffee almost doubled by years in Belgium and Switzerland. Interestingly, the revenue from coffee sales in the UK significantly rose, from 1.5 million of euros in 1999 to 20 million of euros in 2004.

The sales of bananas in Switzerland increased about three-fold into 47 million of euros in 2004 which followed by UK and Belgium that rose from 1 million of euros and 0.6 million of euros respectively to 5.5 million of euros and 4 million of euros respectively. In contrast, the revenue from bananas sales declined into almost halves in both Sweden and Denmark.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (3 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
... biggest sales of coffee in 1999 with 1.8 millions of euros and slightly increased by 0.2 mil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...ns of euros and slightly increased by 0.2 millions of euroes in 2004. This trend was followed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...es in the UK significantly rose, from 1.5 millions of euros in 1999 to 20 millions of euros i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
..., from 1.5 millions of euros in 1999 to 20 millions of euros in 2004. The sales of bananas ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '47 million'.
Suggestion: 47 million
...zerland increased about three-fold into 47 millions of euros in 2004 which followed by UK and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
...llowed by UK and Belgium that rose from 1 millions of euros and 0.6 millions of euros respect...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
...hat rose from 1 millions of euros and 0.6 millions of euros respectively to 5.5 millions of e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...0.6 millions of euros respectively to 5.5 millions of euros and 4 millions of euros respectiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...spectively to 5.5 millions of euros and 4 millions of euros respectively. In contrast, the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9109947644 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72468700963 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439790575916 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3000726818 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220196612411 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113073555765 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919145392855 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181139158886 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101811902221 0.0819641961636 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.