The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts demonstrate how much the coffee and the bananas with Fairtrade-label are sold during 1999 and 2004 in five countries in Europe, namely UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden.
Overall, it is cleared that the markets of the two commodities have become bigger in most countries during the 5 years. In addition, UK was the biggest Fairtrade-labelled bananas market both in 1999 and in 2004 and the biggest market in 2004.
Starting from the first charts, the sales of coffee with Fairtrade-label are merely less than €3 million in all countries during 1999. However, the figure in UK rose to €20 million in 2004, almost as much as 14 times of the amount 5 years ago, while the sales in Switzerland and in Belgium had doubled to €6 million and €1.7 million respectively. Additionally, the markets in rest countries, Denmark and Sweden, remained at around €2 million and €1 respectively during the same time.
Moving to the second table, the Fairtrade-labelled bananas market in UK increased by €32 million, from €15 million in 1999 to €47 million in 2004, and was able to keep its major position amongst the countries. Compared to in 1999, in 2004 people in Switzerland and in Denmark spent €4.5 million and €3.6 million respectively more money on bananas. One the contrary, in Belgium and in Sweden, the money flowing to the markets were approximately €1 million in 2004 which were only about half of the amount in 1999.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages 68
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01632653061 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90923360182 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522448979592 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.4898091642 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.555555556 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169326481036 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838308030984 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562578846786 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122116583156 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026093256846 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.