The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given tables illustrates how sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas varied from 1999 to 2004 in five European countries which are UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, Sweden.
To begin with, sales of coffee in all countries expanded between 1999 and 2004. The biggest figure was sales of UK. It accounted at 1.5 millions of Euros and there was a dramatic increase. Thus, it reached to 20 millions Euros in 2004 consequently. The next rank in sales of coffee was Switzerland. It had taken at 3 millions Euros in 1999 and it rose up by 6 millions Euros in 2004. The sales of Denmark followed at 1.8 millions Euros in 1999 and it grew up by 2 millions Euros slightly. In addition, the sales of Belgium and Sweden followed at 1, 0.8 millions Euros in 1999. There were also increase in both country. They had reached to 1.7, 1 millions Euros in 2004.
Secondly, the top figure amongst sales of bananas was Switzerland. It accounted at 15 millions Euros in 1999 and it increased by 47 millions Euros significantly. It was the most biggest change in both chart. The second highest number was sales of UK. It had taken at 1 millions Euros in 1999 and it rose up by 5.5 millions Euros in 2004. The next was Belgium at 0.6, 4 millions Euros in 1999, 2004. On the other hand, there were decrease in sales of Sweden, Denmark from 1999 to 2004. The number of Sweden decreased from 1.8 millions Euros to 1 millions Euros. The sales of Denmark also diminished from 2 millions Euros to 0.9 millions Euros.
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 78
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 52
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports for younger children).To what extend do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...gure was sales of UK. It accounted at 1.5 millions of Euros and there was a dramatic increase...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'biggest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: biggest
...illions Euros significantly. It was the most biggest change in both chart. The second highes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the biggest'.
Suggestion: most the biggest
...illions Euros significantly. It was the most biggest change in both chart. The second highes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59851301115 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64784242333 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.397769516729 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7598803524 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 61.85 112.824112599 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.45 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130266300753 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598844029945 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584754680032 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146650185582 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812288473143 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.0 13.2329268293 53% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.63 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.