The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

The illustration given provides the information of the commerce revenues of fair trade-labelled coffee and bananas from six different countries in 1999 and 2004.

Firstly, observing from the chart of coffee, the highest and smallest numbers from 1999 and 2004 were Uk from 1,5 to 20 and Switzerland from 3 to 6, respectively. Furthermore, Denmark, Belgium versus Sweden experienced increasing tendencies from 1,8; 1; versus 0,8 in 1999 to 2; 1,7; versus 1 in 2004 for each.

Secondly, according to the illustration of bananas, Uk still remained as the most significant numbers with 47 in 2004, sharply increasing more than two-fold from 15 in 1999. In detail, the figure for the business income of bananas in both Switzerland and Denmark were correspondingly 1; 5,5 and 0,6; 4 in 1999,2004. Additionally, by a drop of approximately 1, Belgium and Sweden represented the quantities of banana sales scored just under 1 in 2004.

Overall, the sales of coffee and banana market were leaded by Uk with the highest number of 20 and 47 for each. While Switzerland and Denmark constantly stabilized in both two fields, Belgium and Sweden received reductions of banana sales.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-21 Pham Mai Nguyet 56 view
2020-01-18 Noah1997 67 view
2020-01-18 Noah1997 67 view
2019-12-25 el-naz 67 view
2019-11-16 yeu192 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arket were leaded by Uk with the highest number of 20 and 47 for each. While Swit...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15706806283 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09729122062 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.9798412796 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 123.125 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200385963425 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994090757697 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599540060307 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142050999889 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618501335659 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.