The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The figure gives a breakdown about amounts of two Fairtrade-*labled products in 5 European countries, namely coffee and bananas, in the years 1999 and 2004.

As we can see, in 1999, Switzerland was at the top of the sales list between these 5 countries with 3 million euros, while Sweden has the minimum amount of sales at .8.by the year 2004, the sales for UK, surprisingly soared to 20 million, whilst the Sweden, Belgium and Denmark faced an increase of less than 1 million. However, Switzerland had scored at 6 million by the year 2004.

On the other hand, the statistics illustrate that in 1999, Belgium used to have minimum rate of bananas purchase, followed by UK standing at .6 and 1 million, respectively. Switzerland, again, topped the list of sales in this year at 15 million. In 2004, it is noticeable that all of the sale rates for bananas has faced an increase, especially for Switzerland reaching 47 million, except Sweden and Denmark, the rates of which had seen a decline from 1.8 and 2 to 1 and .9 million euros, respectively.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...million. In 2004, it is noticeable that all of the sale rates for bananas has faced an inc...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75409836066 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86153112112 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.2106585789 43.030603864 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 145.0 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129897598277 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785425113884 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703466387791 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123447442816 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778319187487 0.0819641961636 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.