Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not.
These days, there is a controversial debate between members of society about the impacts of extreme activities. There are a great number of people who interpret the impacts of these activities as thoroughly constructive, while others hold an opponent view. I am inclined to believe that extreme activities are beneficial and should be promoted.
There are several reasons why dangerous activities are advantageous. First of all, it is argued that such activities play a pivotal role in creating adroit people. This is attributed to the fact that these types of activities could relieve the stress of a person after hectic hours of work time; therefore they would create a feeling of accomplishment and confidence, which consequently open avenues toward new achievements so that the person’s enthusiasm and determination would be amplified toward many daunting tasks. Take bungee jumping for example, even those with a myriad of predicaments would purge their thoughts and vent their feelings after one round of jumping.
In addition, it is claimed that some traits such as overcoming fear and remaining concentrated at high speed would not be achieved by other activities. This is to say that extreme activities provide an opportunity for an individual to work on those talents that may not become of use in regular situations, which would instill a strong feeling of self-esteem so that they are more likely to perform up to expectations in society. Yale University found that extreme activities could enhance a person’s intellectual abilities to make decisions related to social and personal.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounded the view that dangerous activities enhance the mental and physical healthiness of an individual and increase the person’s confidence. It is expected that the administrations take cognizance of these facts and begin to adopt these activities among the young generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-30 | Mpaul | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Simranjot7087 | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | mizomz123 | 55 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | rayudurp | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | jaideep singh | 88 | view |
- technology effecting individual and society.do you agree? 85
- Some people believe law changes human behavior. Do you agree/disagree? 88
- Extreme sports like skiing rafting diving should be banned Agree or disagree 96
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 32
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are beneficial and should be promoted. There are several reasons why dangerous ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r feelings after one round of jumping. In addition, it is claimed that some tra...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isions related to social and personal. In conclusion, the foregoing discussion ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5016722408 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1558972182 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.9482471492 50.4703680194 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.083333333 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.25397266985 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148398338289 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587414769132 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344117699417 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881573973344 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00598718666291 0.0609392437508 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.