The given two tables compare the total number of global public and distribution among six nations between 1950 and 2000, and also total of estimate population in 2050.
Overall, it is clear that there was a significant rise I saw in the total number of world population with an estimate of given three years, 1950, 2000 and 2050, whereas Asia had the largest public in both years which distributed, while Oceania people's remained same in 1950 and 2000 with total numbers.
As can be seen from the first chart, which reveals the total world public from 1950 to 2000 and guestimation population for next 50 years. Like, in 1950 it had a 2.5 billions world population, in 2000, it increased by 3.5 billions and reached at 6.0 billions. In next five years, they estimated 9.0 billions world population according to previous nations public.
Moving towards to next chart to highlight the distribution of population by different regions in which, in 1950, Asia distributed 56% of people's, whereas about a quarter by Europe. Apart from this, others three countries except Oceania distributed less than 10% of public, for oceania it remained unchanged in all three years.
In 2050, Again 60% population divided by Asia, and Europe stood at 12%. Similarly, Africa , Latin America and North America distributed 13%, 8% and 5% of population respectively.
As an estimate of both years, in next 50 years ( 2050), there was an increase trend was observed in only Africa, which was 20% as compared to previous distribution. In Asia, Europe and North America there were decreased by 1%, 5% and 1% respectively. Latin America had no change in population distribution.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 10
- The graph below shows the total births and the deaths in a European country from 1950 to 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and give comparison where relevant 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- The chart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 61
- The chart shows the sports played in Australia in 2003 All figures in percentage 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emained same in 1950 and 2000 with total numbers. As can be seen from the firs...
^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it had a 2.5 billions world population, in 2000, it increased by 3.5 billions an...
^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d Europe stood at 12%. Similarly, Africa , Latin America and North America distrib...
^^
Line 11, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...estimate of both years, in next 50 years 2050, there was an increase trend was ob...
^^
Line 11, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and North America there were decreased by 1%, 5% and 1% respectively. Latin Ame...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 275.0 196.424390244 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04727272727 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71968019544 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523636363636 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6582441148 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278017379114 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102347907361 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658459356403 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152379421058 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538715054194 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.