The tables compare the amount of money of selling coffee and bananas, in two separate years, in five difference EU nations.
The tables compare the amount of money of selling coffee and bananas, in two separate years, in five difference EU nations.
Overall, the sales of coffee in all countries rose over the periods while the sales of bananas went up only in three out of five nations. The UK saw the highest points for selling two products.
The revenue from selling coffee dramatically increased, in the UK, from $1.5 (1999) to reach a peak of $20 million (2004). During this time, sales of this product rose double, in Switzerland, from $3 million (1999). Although this figure also slightly climbed, in Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden, the sales of coffee of these countries remain below $2 million in both years
Sales of bananas rose considerably, in the UK, from $15 (1999) to the highest point of $47 million (2004). The number of selling this product also rapidly increased, in Switzerland and Denmark, from $1 and $0,6 million (1999) to $5,5 and $4 million (2004), respectively. By contrast, this figure, in the two remain nations, decreased to around $1 million (2004).
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealandand Germany in 1980 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The map below shows the outline of the village of Chorleywood in the period from 1868 to 1994. 67
- The line charts compare the number of people who emigrate and immigrate in the UK while the bar graph shows the net of migration between 1999 and 2008. 73
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on theprotection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the humanpopulation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are important in achieving happiness? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roduct rose double, in Switzerland, from million 1999. Although this figure also ...
^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...duct rose double, in Switzerland, from million 1999. Although this figure also slightl...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f coffee of these countries remain below million in both years Sales of banan...
^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ries remain below million in both years Sales of bananas rose considerably, in t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reased, in Switzerland and Denmark, from and sh,6 million 1999 to ,5 and million...
^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Denmark, from and sh,6 million 1999 to ,5 and million 2004, respectively. By co...
^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k, from and sh,6 million 1999 to ,5 and million 2004, respectively. By contrast,...
^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... from and sh,6 million 1999 to ,5 and million 2004, respectively. By contrast, this f...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... two remain nations, decreased to around million 2004.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90751445087 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55513560616 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514450867052 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3381254125 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.125 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281653239766 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178912180299 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.312477625936 0.0843802449381 370% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313892610966 0.15604864568 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.397960700927 0.0819641961636 486% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.