The tables given below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1990 and 2004 in five european countries.
The data regarding the amount of revenue recieved from two fairtrade labelled product coffee and bananas from 1999 to 2004 by five different European nations is illustrated through the given tabular chart.
On having an overall, it is apparent that, maximum revenue was earned by the UK from both products; however, the Belgium was recieved minimum income for the same.
Upon analysing the table chart, in case of coffee, it is vivid that, the UK was on the top who earned large amount of money with 21.5 million euros in both years. This was followed by Switzerland who observed two time surg up in their sale with 6 million euros in 2004. This was carried by two nations Denmark and Belgium with 3.8 million euros and 2.7 million euros in 1999 and 2004 respectively. Moreover, the Swedeen was experienced approximately similar sale in 2004.
Moveing to the sale of bananas, in which the UK was witnessed three fold went up from 15 million euros. Switzerland earning was 1 million euros but after that it was significantly rose by 5 million euros by the year 2004. The sale in Denmark was doubled by the their sale of coffee but sale of bananas in Belgium was just same as the sale of coffee. It is interesting to note that the earning of Swedeen in 1999 was on second highest but in 2004 that earning was reached on the last position.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-08 | Do Quang Huy | 77 | view |
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what way has technology affected the types of relationships people Make Is this a positive or negative development 61
- Using a computer every day can have more negative than positive effects on young children Do you agree or disagree 56
- The table provides information on the number of visitors to three seaside towns in a European country in 1990 and 2010 80
- The graph on the right shows the way of people of somecountry in invested their money during the years 2001 2006 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'fold' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'folds'.
Suggestion: folds
...as, in which the UK was witnessed three fold went up from 15 million euros. Switzerl...
^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...ros but after that it was significantly rose by 5 million euros by the year 2004. Th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...004. The sale in Denmark was doubled by the their sale of coffee but sale of bananas in B...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, regarding, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65546218487 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45023918364 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487394957983 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3559047402 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154695313113 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744304819915 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754007505487 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108909333842 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900346915196 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.