The tables shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table provides information about the amount of mobile phones sold in millions from 2006 to 2012 in various labels namely Nokia, Ericsson, Samsung, Motorola and Apple.
Overall, the number of cell phones rose significantly almost types except for those of Ericsson and Motorola. It can be seen obviously that Nokia had the highest levels throughout the period from 345 million in 2006 to 475 million in 2008. This number dropped slightly to 335 million in 2012.Similarly, Samsung as well as Apple followed the same upward trend and went up rapidly between 2006 and 2012 in selling phones. Noticeably, Apple saw no amount of phones sold in 2006, which eventually appeared in 2007, at 2.3 million.
Conversely, there was a sustantial fall in the number of cell phones sold in Ericsson almost the period. This data was in 74 million in 2006 and then decreased to just 28 million at the end of 2012. It also hit the lowest amount compared with 4 other famous brands.Finally, Motorola had a consistent reduction from 210 to 28 million over the past six years.
To sum, the world is getting more and more modern with the development of technology, which leads to the great need of high tech of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-15 | nguyenthanhhoa1904 | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | view | |
| 2022-02-15 | Ngoc Trinh | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Similarly
...dropped slightly to 335 million in 2012.Similarly, Samsung as well as Apple followed the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Finally
...unt compared with 4 other famous brands.Finally, Motorola had a consistent reduction fr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, if, similarly, so, then, well, except for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80676328502 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61709151704 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618357487923 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6214803608 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195404269242 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850015107345 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512974076594 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113727305344 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067121308677 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.