Task 1 the three charts below show the percentage of the method which students travel to school in Britain Australia and Singapore Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

Task 1: the three charts below show the percentage of the method which students travel to school in Britain, Australia and Singapore. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

A quick glance at the three pie charts provided reveals the relative popularity of various means of transport which students in Britain, Australia and Singapore travel to school.
It is apparent from the information supplied that of these method of travel, the majority is car in Britain and Australia, both accounting for 65 per cent of the students. In stark contrast, people in Singapore, however, don’t prefer travel by car, and it is the least popular method of transport, with a merge 10 per cent of the students. There are considerable differences in the percentage of public transport. A large figure of students in Singapore use public transport while these values in Britain and Australia are much lower, being 16 per cent and 20 per cent respectively. Less than 20 per cent of students walk to school in Britain and Australia. For Singaporeans, walking is the second popular option, with a quarter of them travelling to school on foot.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-07-07 Tran Thu 74 view
Essays by user Tran Thu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this method' or 'these methods'?
Suggestion: this method; these methods
...t from the information supplied that of these method of travel, the majority is car in Brita...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...least popular method of transport, with a merge 10 per cent of the students. There are ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00628930818 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86920692944 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591194968553 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5563161193 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221436814783 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109755902618 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599733187932 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195835091036 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299297549668 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.