The pie charts compares the changes in governments’ investment in Someland from 1980 to 2000.
It is clear that, in all 3 years, the percentage of higher education was always highest. Furthermore, the percentage of higher education also experienced the most significant change over the period.
In 1980, local authorities in Someland spent the most money on higher education, with 35 percent of sum of money they spent. Then the number rose to 45 percent in 1990 before declined to 40 percent in 2000. In contrast, the proportion of money spent on K-12 education continuously fell from 1980 to 2000, 25%, 20% and 18% respectively.
This trend was true for the number of the other fields. In 1980, the proportion on this category was 6%, then it decreased gradually to 4% and 1% in 1990 and 2000 respectively. Besides, the percentage of environmental services rose slightly from 4% in 1980 to 5% in 1990 and 9% in 2000.
- With all the troubles in the world today money spent on space exploration is a complete waste The money could be better spent on other things To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to more than technology in homes in the UK. 73
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors - agriculture, manufacturing and business and financial services - to the UK economy in the twentieth century. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and the comparis 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87974683544 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01303715307 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2111083319 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.6666666667 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256370926598 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104965508489 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935294875061 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164620729919 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105103330775 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.