The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The given pie charts indicates how the average school spending changed in UK over the period 1981 to 2001.
According to the pie charts, the highest proportion of money spent on teachers' salaries in the school with 40% in 1981. After a decade, the figure represented noticable increase to half of total spending (50%). However, it decreased to 45% in 2001. The next popular spending was other workers' salaries with being 28% at the beginning of the period and the number declined gradually showing 22% in 1991, 15% in 2001.
Furthermore, the educational institution allocate its much less money on other purposes. "Resources" and "Furniture and equipment" took the same sector with 15% in 1981. Whereas, the percentage of resources rose to 20% while "Furniture and equipment" was 5%. In 2001, these figures represented 9% and 23% respectively. The smallest allocation of money was insurance with 2% in 1981 and it reached its a peak of 8% in 2001, after showing 3% in 1991.
Overall, the biggest school spending was teachers' salaries while the least proportion of money spent on insurance in the years.
- The chart shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries 61
- The pie charts show average household expenditure in Hong Kong and Britain in the year 2000. 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- The given bar chart indicates a comparison of Australian genders with the exact percents who do exercises frequently according to their various age groups As can be seen from the chart males did more physical exercises than females at the age of 15 to 24
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...nsurance with 2% in 1981 and it reached its a peak of 8% in 2001, after showing 3% ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16304347826 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21584863134 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548913043478 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3558326271 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3636363636 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265890180181 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101301288893 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108490795607 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192017517346 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130786692861 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.