The pie charts indicate how money consumption changed in a UK school by three years 1981, 1991 and 2001.
In general, it is clear that the school spent most of the money to pay for teachers and spent the least on insurance over the three years mentioned.
The teacher’s salaries accounted for 40% in 1981, then increased to 50% in 1991 before declining to 45% in 2001. The payment for other workers took the second place of total spending with almost a third in 1981 and 1991. However, in 2001, it was down to the third place with just a minority, gave the second place for Facilities with 23%, which was 15% in 1981 and a small number of 5% in 1991.
Likewise, we could see the percentage of money paid for other resources was just a minority of 15% in 1981 and 20% in 1991. In 2001, the school spent even less than that with 9%. The last one was the expense for health, just a very small number with 2%, 3% and 8% respectively in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 31
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ies with 23%, which was 15% in 1981 and a small number of 5% in 1991. Likewise, we could see the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% respectively in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, second, so, then, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.36464088398 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27912439 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524861878453 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3494107365 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196350128067 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106103784925 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872373477671 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151141899387 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107874633673 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 91.44 61.2550243902 149% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.