The three pie charts depict how popular five different social sites were among people in a specific nation in 2011, 2012, and 2013.
Overall, Facebook, which was the most famous site among the people, lost its popularity slightly but remained the first preference of the people. Twitter was the second most used site. However, all the other three sites had fewer users in all the given years.
To begin with, Facebook had enormous popularity as almost three-fifths of people were using it. However, despite losing almost 20% of users over the period, it maintained the status of being the most preferred social site. Similarly, Twitter was the second most used social network. In 2011, just above 20% of people liked it, but in the next two years, its users increased slightly to a quarter.
On the other hand, although Linked In, Google+, and Pinterest gained popularity over the period, they were not as popular as the other two sites. Both Google+ and Pinterest were used by 5% individuals, while the users of Linked In were double than them. After two years, the preference for these social network channels rose steadily to 8% for Pinterest, almost 15% for both Linked In and Google+. Eventually, Pinterest was the least preferred site in all three years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-22 | prabh362@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- The two pie charts compare the production of energy from different five sources in the USA in 1980 and 1990
- The three pie charts depict how popular five different social sites were among people in a specific nation in 2011 2012 and 2013 78
- The charts show the amount nd quality of water supplied to two regions of the world 61
- The two pie charts compare the production of energy from different five sources in the USA in 1980 and 1990
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, similarly, so, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95789473684 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38080970421 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5458032998 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6363636364 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17284035444 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726221471311 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313119454115 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123133008657 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188441421729 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.