The three pie charts show the proportion of four kinds of vehicles used in the UK in 1965, 1985 and 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chats elucidate the innovation of different kinds of cars used in the UK during the four decades from 1965 to 2005.
It is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the dominant, private cars in comparison with other indicators. It witnessed a dramatic expansion in its rate from 47% to 74% over the decades. Likewise, the upward trend happened in the minority, recreational vehicles. The percentage of that had climbed to 9% from 4% during the period is shown.
Nevertheless, in terms of public transport, a draft plunge can be seen in its percentage. It ranked second at 29% in 1965 before bottomed at 5% and became the least in 2005.
Following the same pattern as that, lorries and other commercial cars fell to 12% with erratic fluctuation, where it, initially, stood at 20% in 1965.
Overall, it can be seen that private cars are becoming the mainstream, following that, the recreational vehicles are developing but still take up a small space in total vehicles used in the UK over the 40 years.
- Nowadays, most countries improve the standard of living through economic development. But some social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of the phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom. Do you think the advantages of this development overweight the disadvantages? 84
- The three pie charts show the proportion of four kinds of vehicles used in the UK in 1965 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people think that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or they are most interested in. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, nevertheless, second, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82954545455 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77549694009 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9610791413 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146092540815 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518774154627 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719610232269 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873279706334 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077753575658 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.