Time schoolchildren spend on different home acticities
Information relating to the time which schoolchildren have spent in various home activities like computer and tv, during the period from 2000 till the present time is provided in the line graph.
Overall, children spent their time with computer. Now that, we can see an upward trend from this.
As to the letter, spending hour on tv decreased slightly and then the figure fluctuated.
In accordance with details children have spent nearly 3 hours in per week in 2000. At the same time spending time on tv was more than 20. Then watching tv standed at till 2003 and dropped at 15 hours. At that time playing computer reached at the same level. After that pattern fluctuated on watching tv till mid 2006 and then it maintained the same level till the present. As for playing computer hit the highest point up to now.
In conclusion, it can be seen that computer requires more time today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-15 | EELLeeee | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-19 | vaguely | view | |
| 2020-05-19 | vaguely | view | |
| 2019-11-25 | Sanatbek Sobirov | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | AlisherBabajonov | 63 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Information relating to the time which s...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t time is provided in the line graph. Overall, children spent their time with ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ghtly and then the figure fluctuated. In accordance with details children have...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uter hit the highest point up to now. In conclusion, it can be seen that compu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, as for, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 738.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73076923077 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45120024539 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0494561625 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.0909090909 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.1818181818 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177389001962 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659221021464 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076661795728 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979582324499 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535306399757 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.