The two bar charts compare the proportion of 3 different age groups in a population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and 2050.
In general, adults who are in 15-59 age group, has accounted for a large percentage in Yemen and Italy in both years. In addition, the population of elderly who ages 60 or above was the smallest in 2000, and the same conditon is also predicted in 2050.
Look at Yemen, exactly half of the population were adults aging 15-59 in 2000, which was the majority of the Yemen population. Nevertheless, it will drop to below one third of the population at 37% in 2050. On the contrary, the population of children and elderly has the opposite trend compared to adults, which their percentage in population will rise. In 2000, elderly only accounted for slightly less than half of the whole population at 47%. Then, in 2050, this age group will increase slightly to abouta third of the population at 57%. Similaly, the ratio of elderly in Yemen will also increase slightly despite them being the smallest proportion. In 2000, the population of elderly has only accounted for 3.6%, then there will be a slight incrrease in 2050 to 5.7%.
As in Italy, around two third of the population were adults aging 15-59 in 2000, which meant they were the majority of the population at that time. Then, the ratio of this age group will shirnk to half of the population in 2050. Moreover, there has been a mild drop in the percentage of elderly population, from 14.8% in 2002, to 11.5% in 2050. However, unlike these two age groups, the proportion of adults has incrased by a double, from slightly more than a quartr in 2000, to around half of the population in 2050.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, third, in addition, in general, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 33.7804878049 192% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 3.97073170732 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 297.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6430976431 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.522036111 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424242424242 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6260390531 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.5 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217004448945 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997887438378 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445925977536 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1713411423 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322181317802 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.