Transport delays and long journey times are a widespread phenomenon in many cities today. What are the causes of this problem, and how could the situation be improved?
These days, traffic congestion, which lengthens the amount of time it takes for travelling within the city, is an intractable problem that commuters in particular and the government as a whole have to face. There seem to be two main causes involved and there is a myriad of possible measures to tackle this problem.
The most obvious rationales leading to this trend are the want of investment in ameliorating infrastructure and overpopulation. Firstly, if the number of private vehicles on the street augment rapidly, the emergence of traffic congestion will be inevitable. This means that the disadvantaged traffic system of one country with narrow streets and many allies may lead to many bottlenecks on the road, especially during peak hours. Secondly, overcrowding in major cities caused by the influx of people coming from hinterlands to settle in urban areas in a bid to raise the ceiling on their future earning potential should be taken into account too. In other words, the more people reside in a city, the more private vehicles on the street, thereby imposing a heavy strain on the traffic systems, which are already stretched.
Regardless, funding for upgrading infrastructure and heightening the awareness of individuals should be applied to deal with this issue. If the government’s financial foundation is not strong enough to improve the current system, a public-private partnership, which is a mutually-reinforcing development, would be a practical option. Widening roads or enhancing networks, for example, may likely to pave the pathway for the appearance of the high-capacity traffic system. Furthermore, it is incumbent upon the government to offer individuals an impetus to partake in the communal car-pooling. This may happen by explaining for commuters that their positive deeds contribute to preserving the environment as well as abating the severe traffic problem.
In conclusion, a ramshackle infrastructure and the trend of flocking to developed areas are highlighted as the main causes engendering this trend. The cooperation between the government, private companies, and individuals are required to solve this problem at its root cause.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-22 | nguyen duc tri | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below gives information about five countries spending habits of shopping on consumer goods in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Transport delays and long journey times are a widespread phenomenon in many cities today What are the causes of this problem and how could the situation be improved 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 824, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c systems, which are already stretched. Regardless, funding for upgrading infras...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, in particular, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 965.302439024 191% => OK
No of words: 337.0 196.424390244 172% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45697329377 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25601373516 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 106.607317073 185% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584569732938 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 283.868780488 199% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9520368823 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.357142857 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157449561877 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527358853469 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038768242753 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978573439723 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212435897827 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 40.7170731707 251% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.