Transportation of goods UK
The given line graph illustrates the quantity of goods that were transported in the UK during 1974 and 2002. Especially, it is focused on the means of transportation that were used. The measurement of units is in million tones.
Overall, it seems that road transportation was the main way to ship products in this time period. In 1971, 70 millions tones of goods were delivered in this way, amount that decreased slightly in 1982 but gradually climed up to 100 millions in 2002.
Shipping lanes and Railway were approximately in the same levels until 1978, whereas, the latter started falling to a mere of 20 million tones the first was climbing to 60 milions. Both transportation forms respectively rose after 1998 and 1994.
According to the graph, pipelines, appeares to be merely increased until 1994 reaching a peak at 20 milion of transported goods, amount that remained stable until 2002.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-19 | Chen ni | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-10 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | nkajune | view | |
| 2023-03-02 | nkajune | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...re used. The measurement of units is in million tones. Overall, it seems that road t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 757.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04666666667 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8573569761 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.646666666667 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3020546594 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.625 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254160247303 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108158273612 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112588565375 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146887540889 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115161901155 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.