The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980 and the 1990s.
The pie chart illustrates that energy is produced by five different categories in two different period of 1980 and 1990 in USA.
Overall, Oil supplied the largest energy between 1980 and 1990 .While Nearly same amount of energy was produced by using nature gas. In USA for both time period, hydroelectric power was least choice for generating electric.
Firstly, major source of energy produced with oil at 42% in 1980 but it decreased to 35% in next 10 years of period. In terms of coal, the figure for that stood at 22% while it declined by 5% in 1990. Regarding of nuclear power was second lowest preferrable way to produce energy, accounting for 6%, before witnessing an increased to 10% in 1990.
By contrast, the percentage of hydroelectric power for producing energy stood at 5% in 1980 since, it remained similar in 1980. Afterward, the percentage of source of energy was around at 26% 1980, then it accounted for 25% in 1990 with nearly same as it was noted in 1980. Finally the difference of that percentage was 1% throughout the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | Spring2019 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | tiendung00001 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Lia Bui | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Kamal1993 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | green1222 | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 73
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 78
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 67
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the largest energy between 1980 and 1990 .While Nearly same amount of energy was p...
^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...e largest energy between 1980 and 1990 .While Nearly same amount of energy was produc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e largest energy between 1980 and 1990 .While Nearly same amount of energy was produc...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e amount of energy was produced by using nature gas. In USA for both time period,...
^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...th nearly same as it was noted in 1980. Finally the difference of that percentage was 1...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80769230769 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65286765571 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565934065934 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8146288319 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.2222222222 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199765845288 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092216651304 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759452454755 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143593903606 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474744895943 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.