The two provided pie charts bestow an acumen about the foremost sources of energy in the united states of America and it illustrates the two distinct years 1980s and 1990s.
In 1980, oil was the major source for the USA in both the time periods which was highly used to fabricate 42% energy in 1980 s and 33% in 1990 s but when it came to natural gas, it had a cardinal role to create the energy equally in both the years. Turning to coal, the percentage increased to 27% in 1990s from 22% in 1980s.
Furthermore, the least contribution can be clearly seen in the source of hydroelectric power just by 5% Whereas the nuclear power showed an escalation of 5% in the upcoming year 1990s as compare to the previous year.
Overall, it is evident that except hydroelectric power and nuclear energy, the other sources such as oil, natural gas and coal all these were the major source of energy in the USA during both the decades.
- you forget your bag in the gym and gym management announced that the gym will be closed for a week for some renovation work You need your bag as it has important things in it Write a letter to the manager of the gym In your letter introduce yourself and d 87
- Nowadays, people waste a lot of food that is bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away? 56
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 68
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing what do you think are the causes of problems and what measures could be tackled to solve them 61
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...o coal, the percentage increased to 27% in 1990s from 22% in 1980s. Furthermore, the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...tage increased to 27% in 1990s from 22% in 1980s. Furthermore, the least contribution...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uclear energy, the other sources such as oil, natural gas and coal all these wer...
^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as oil, natural gas and coal all these were the major source of energy in the U...
^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re the major source of energy in the USA during both the decades.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5325443787 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4274350127 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609467455621 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0877313831 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.2 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229779416208 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114855494085 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379415715489 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129793411503 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429177272693 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.36 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.59 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.