The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s.
The pie charts illustrate the percentages of five energy products in the USA in two decades.
Overall, the quantity of oil, natural gas and coal were the largest during the 20-year timescale. Besides, the figure for oil witnessed a considerable decline at the end of the period.
in the 1980s, the percentage of oil produced was 42 per cent then dropped to 33 per cent in the next 20 years. Whereas, the opposite trend was experienced by the proportion of coal, which. was 22 per cent at the beginning of the period then dropped by 5 percent 20 years later.
Between the 1980s and 1990s, the amount of nuclear power doubled to 10 per cent while the figure for hydroelectric power remained steady at 5 per cent during the period. On the other hand, natural gas accounted for one-fourth the amount of energy production in the USA in the 20-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | Spring2019 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | tiendung00001 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Lia Bui | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Kamal1993 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | green1222 | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the year 2006, 2007 and 2014 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women form 1978 to 2008 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007 73
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...le decline at the end of the period. in the 1980s, the percentage of oil produc...
^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Was
...enced by the proportion of coal, which. was 22 per cent at the beginning of the per...
^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en dropped by 5 percent 20 years later. Between the 1980s and 1990s, the amount ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 711.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70860927152 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59102098865 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549668874172 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4863602538 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.875 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106578765944 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049180464551 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633180422486 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808735688065 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754323073038 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.