Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
These days, it is generally believed that people have too many options to approach the world. While I think that compared to the past, more opportunities have been provided to self-developments, I hold a firm belief that there exist limits of choices for residents in numerous third-world nations to have their crucial rights.
On one hand, in the modern life, people are likely to have more chances to get improved in several aspects. Firstly, job opportunities have become increasingly available. As humans have been in the industrialization age, new industries such as nuclear, e-commerce and cryptocurrency have strongly developed, requiring a huge number of employees. Secondly, nowadays, students have been provided with various ways to gain knowledge. For example, instead of sitting in classes in person, learners can also register and participate in online courses with a variety of reference e-books available on the internet.
However, in some developing countries, people have been sufferring from insufficiency of several fundamental human rights. Regarding medical conditions, governments in these countries seemingly fail to cater enough hospitals for patients, advanced equipment as well as qualified personnels. It seems unfair that people who could have been saved have to be departed because of economic difficiency. Another considerable problem worth mentioning is hunger. In some poor countries such as India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, thousands of citizens have been undernourished everyday. Additionally, the limited food they have appears to be unnutritious without food safety.
In conclusion, although I agree that the mordern life provides people such wonderful opportunities to broaden their horizons, I strongly argue that the significant inequality of human rights still exists, restraining civilization development.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 84
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilites. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Caring for children is probably the most important job in any society Because of this all mothers and fathers should be required to take a course that prepares them to be good parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 82
- The pie chart below shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ds of citizens have been undernourished everyday. Additionally, the limited food they ha...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, third, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85977859779 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24704796524 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656826568266 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7546186199 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7857142857 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181994092887 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647434145025 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526557930902 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104871410273 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333739978276 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.