The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps give information about several changes happening on an island because of the construction of some tourist facilities.
It is clear that the erection of new facilities has completely created a new appearance for the island, from an original wilderness to a well-supplied recreational landscape.
At first, the island was pristine, consisting of mostly nothing but a few jungles in the middle-east and middle-west and a beach in the western coast. The total length of the island is approximately 250 metres.
After tourist facilities are constructed, the island experiences considerable changes. Visitors set their first step on this island at a pier emerging on the south, then visit a reception right at the center, circled by a vehicle track which also leads to a restaurant on the north. The east and west of this island show the mushrooming of accommodations, with footpaths connecting dwellings so that tourists can easily go around. Specially, a new swimming area is developed on the west, taking advantage of the original beach.
- The diagram below shows the process of making olive oil
- Fossil fuels coal oil and natural gas are the main sources in many countries However in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy wind and solar energy are encouraged Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- Despite huge improvements in healthcare the overall standard of physical health in many developed countries is now falling What could be the reason for this trend and what can be done to reverse it 84
- The process below shows the process of growing and making products from pineapple Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 72
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25443786982 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16911277737 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668639053254 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2751010975 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205228130408 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909056230572 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091298996003 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130259823567 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936022671985 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.