The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The map shows the differences previously and after the development of tourist facilities in the coastal areas.

Overall, a plethora of changes would be seen in the accommodation, leisure amenities, and public facilities, while the coconut trees show to be the same.

When it comes to the east area, 10 accommodation are developed with the new footpath around those accommodations, while the coconut trees remain unchanged. Moreover, developers are built the pier facing to the sea, making numerous canoes can step aside in there in the south, and they are established the restaurant in the opposite direction.

In addition, in the middle of the map is erected reception building with the vehicle track around it, while the foot route is connected to that building, and in the west area the six cottages are constructed around the coconut trees with as well as the footpath. Furthermore, those paths continue to the beach with the new swimming area.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88381755349 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.137316664 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.085655176146 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500815151256 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724096544525 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0712068221587 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795637585617 0.0819641961636 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.