The two maps provided intend to showcase the numerous structural alterations made on a barren island. The construction of said facilities is undertaken to promote tourism.
The outline of the island’s initial framework depicts the deserted surroundings with a few scattered groups of trees. However, the depiction of the island following the remodelling portrays all the measures taken to enable touristry. These include the construction of a pier to ferry individuals over to the island by water transport and the establishment of roadways so that tourists can reach the reception on automobiles. The living quarters built on either side of the island are accessible only via footpaths.
Furthermore, a restaurant is established on the edge of the island overlooking the sea, which is also reachable by motor vehicles. The beach which was already present is upgraded for swimming activities.
To sum up, the task of reconstructing the island for tourism was accomplished successfully. Another commendable observation, is in the midst of the renovation process, the natural surroundings, which include the plant life of the isle, were not harmed.
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 84
- The two maps below show the Paradise island in the past and in the present 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 84
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ties is undertaken to promote tourism. The outline of the island’s initial framewo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47191011236 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25836884876 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651685393258 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4477708509 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18003651223 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634118148317 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503483355634 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100428665749 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765616225101 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.