The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The two maps illustrate an island, before and after numerous innovations for tourism purposes.
Overall, it can be seen that many new facilities for tourists were built.
Before the constructions, there were only a few trees to the west and east of the island and the beach to the left of the island was not used yet. After the constructions took place, a lot more facilities were built. A pier was constructed in the south of the island, allowing access to the island by boats. A reception area and a restaurant were located in the centre of the island. To the left and right of the reception area, two new accommodation areas were created, each consists of several houses forming a circle.
To allow easier transportation in the island, lots of vehicle tracks were opened. These tracks connected the pier to the reception area and to the restaurant. Moreover, the houses in the accommodation areas were connected with each other through numerous footpaths, with one of these paths connecting the area to the beach, which now allowed tourists to go swimming.
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 67
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year 74
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog 70
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 67
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... through numerous footpaths, with one of these paths connecting the area to the b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90607734807 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78943705202 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53591160221 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7008196643 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21067571077 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939041747634 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924812784767 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149375449502 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120958399689 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.