The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given to map depict several modifications made on a particular small island. Generally, territory was uninhabited before any constructions were done.
Noteworthy, new large facilities were erected in the center. For example, the reception was built and surrounded by vehicle tracks, which led to another outstanding alteration, the restaurant. This place is building was constructed along shore. Or the office is closed, so long Pierre was opened in order to create both a mooring line for sailing ships and terroristic sport for visitors.
Considering the less noticeable changes, a great number of dwellings, resembling bungalows were raised. To connect each of them, miles or footpaths were built throughout the island. One part was meant for outlet to the beach, where after the construction several favorable conditions were made for swimming facilities. Furthermore, even if building of accommodation needed clearance of the area, all palm trees remained untouched.
Overall, the island territory altered dramatically and was turned into tourist district.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68125 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05234924894 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.73125 0.547539520022 134% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9765748764 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6363636364 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5454545455 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0998314729993 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378588988061 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038632964499 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694366455432 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035414366548 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.07 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.