The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps indicate the difference of a island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
It is explicit that two-third land is reconstructed effectively for tourist activities and tourist services.
To begin with, reception area is located at the middle of the island and it is also bounded around with vehicle track to easily catch the other areas. Following the vehicle route back to the reception is the enormous restaurant. Particularly, accommodation areas are built two side of the reception, in which, the smaller area is designed with 6 villas and has the route led to the beach, where tourists can swim. Beside, the opposite side has the bigger accommodation is ready to service with 9 villas.
On the other hand, it is not total island reconstructed approximately on-third of island is stayed in primary status. Furthermore, they also investigated for building the bridge to lead into the whole picture of island become more adorable.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-13 dhnhung 56 view
2019-10-28 Jack koh 73 view
2019-10-28 Jack koh 56 view
2019-10-19 thucanhm 56 view
2019-10-16 WAFA 11 view
Essays by user lavendar95 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...The two maps indicate the difference of a island before and after the constructio...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, third, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1582278481 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97582122064 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613924050633 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7448322566 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190219907968 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899903377894 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130969583784 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159936323861 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154035952914 0.0819641961636 188% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.