The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.

Essay topics:

The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.

The two maps above depict how an island looked, before and after some tourist services were established.

Overall, the island underwent a huge transformation. It saw numerous additions such as golf, tennis, car park, etc. there were also several places that were demolished or replaced, whereas a few facilities remained the same.

Over the period, the farmland and the forest park in the northeast of the island were converted into leisure facilities such as golf field and tennis, respectively. after the development, the fish market was replaced by apartments. Similarly, the shops in front of the fish marked turned into restaurants.

Another change can be noted in the residential area, as they expanded after the construction. A new car park adjacent to the hotel was introduced to the island. In 1995, there was a fishing port in the sea, which later disappeared. The hotel and the cafe in the southeast of the island saw no change.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-20 Noah1997 78 view
2019-11-27 Leeinho 78 view
2019-11-27 Saeed Najd Ataei 84 view
2019-11-13 dhnhung 56 view
2019-11-04 Nerissa 78 view
Essays by user lusinelusine :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...as golf field and tennis, respectively. after the development, the fish market was re...
^^^^^
Line 16, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... southeast of the island saw no change.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, similarly, so, whereas, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23717948718 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84761887681 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4297049304 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.2727272727 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1818181818 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197948341985 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685441735313 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117139627015 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14603337026 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164423092578 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.