The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given maps illustrate the reconstruction of the road system that took place between 2007 and 2010.

Overall, over the 3-year period, the area witnessed dramatic changes. The two road intersections were reconstructed into roundabouts. One more car park was added. There were no other changes in landscape and buildings.

Considerable changes were made to the road structure. In 2007 City Road, Hospital Rd and Ring Road used to cross in simple intersections. Six bus stops were located along the Hospital Road. However, during the development, the crossroads were turned into roundabouts and a large area to the left of the Hospital Rd was allocated to a bus station, to which access could be gained from both roundabouts.

Parking space was extended during the period. If in 2007 there was an only car park, which combined parking spots for both hospital staff and public and was located along the hospital road to the south of the building, in 2010 the new large parking space was added to the left of the city hospital. Thus, the functions of the car parks were reassigned, making the old one intended for staff only and the new one - for the public.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93908629442 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68192755964 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543147208122 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 66.7780319832 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0833333333 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16604600803 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639633469695 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631140546074 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109382392621 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477038571254 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.