The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The first map illustrates the City Hospital and its road network in 2007. While the second map depicts the changes have happened in the area after three years.
Overall, Most alteration had occurred to the south of the City Hospital by adding two roundabouts and a bus station.
In 2007, the City Road was connected to the Ring Road by Hospital Road in which there were some Bus stops. However, in 2010, two roundabouts were built in the junction of Hospital road with City Road and Ring Road. The Bus stops were removed and a new Bus station was constructed to the West of the Hospital Road which can be reached by two roundabouts.
Another significant improvement was in terms of parking. A cart park on the East side of the Hospital Road where used to be for both staff and public, in 2010, just staff were allowed to park their cars. However a new car park for the public was constructed to the East side of the Ring road.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...ovement was in terms of parking. A cart park on the East side of the Hospital Road w...
^^^^
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... staff were allowed to park their cars. However a new car park for the public was const...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48235294118 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37609199081 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7088032542 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6666666667 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241657568272 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112384518882 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824657229858 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142720552161 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538790872757 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.