The maps illustrate the development of road around city hospital for three years since 2007. It is immediately apparent that there are the significant alterations in terms of amenities and infrastructure during this period.
Regarding the year of 2007, it is clearly seen that city hospital –in the north area– was surrounded by ring road which was integrated to city road by means of hospital road having three couples of bus stops along the way. Following this, there was car park which was addressed to public and hospital’s employee.
Subsequently, three years later, the infrastructure experienced a considerable development in form of the road which has developed to be two roundabouts located on each side of hospital road. In addition, not only were all bus stops replaced by bus station placed to the west of hospital road, but also linked with two roundabouts. The last alteration occurred in the car park that was divided to be two part; car park for staff and car park for the public. While the former is situated in the initial place –to the eastern hospital road–, the latter is put behind the ring road and to the west of hospital road.
- The two maps below shows road access to a hospital in 2007 and in 2009 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- The table below shows the information about the underground railway system in six cities. 56
- The table below shows the information about the underground railway system in six cities. 73
- Below is the map of Canterbury town. There is a plan of building a new school in this town where two possible sites (S1 and S2) have been proposed. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95431472081 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81868990043 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1767805076 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272619918877 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126876842966 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849182713666 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18814570492 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260070567551 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.