The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010
The two pie charts below illustrate the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010, and the data is measured in percentage. Overall it can be seen that the significant increase was food and beverage than followed by video games.
In 2005, it was apparent that the electronics and appliance sector accounted more than a third of the online shopping sales, and it was the highest proportion for retail sector in Canada in 2005 then followes by food and beverages, there was the second largest percentage of online shopping sales. It got 22%, during five-year period the most popular sector of online shopping sales in Canada had dropped by one in twenty while the second largest percentage was maximum increase in five-year period.
In 2010 home furnishing sector occupied less than a fifth of the online shopping sales, it was the smallest percentage. Difference video game as the second popular sector was 23%, online sales of video games was slightly increased by one in twenty during five-year period while the home furnishing sharply fallen by one in ten.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-07-05 | jasmine.27 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Maju Chowdhury | 67 | view |
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 67
- The three pie chart below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 60
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all source and renewables in the year 2009 67
- The pie chart below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 67
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...centage of online shopping sales. It got 22%, during five-year period the most po...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96703296703 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48672359295 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489010989011 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.0916021209 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.666666667 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382229921362 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231187421838 0.103423049105 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.240587743916 0.0843802449381 285% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300987925201 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145748795636 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.