The pie chart below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The pie charts given below describe average household expenditures between Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. Data is calibrated in percentage. Overall, it clearly seen that in Japan, other goods and service made up the biggest part of the chart while in Malaysia the highest segment was housing. And both of Japan and Malaysia health care was the smallest percentage of all categories.
Looking at the information in more detail, it seen that average household expenditures in Japan was Other good and service. The percentage was 29%. Followed by food sector as the second largest part of chart was 24%. While, the lowest contribution of all sectors was health care. It got 6% of all major categories.
As the highlighted in the pie chart of Malaysia. Housing made up the biggest percentage. proportion of Housing in Malaysia was 34%. Difference, food sector made the second hugest proportion of Average Household expenditures in Malaysia. It got 27%. Between food sector and good and service sector different by 1 % which was 26% for goods and service. While, the percentage of Health care im Malaysia was a half of proportion in Japan.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | vuongthaolinh | 85 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | huongab123 | view | |
| 2023-06-19 | mykhanh | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | saminhsn | view | |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | view |
- The two pie charts given below describe some eployment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 and the data is calibrate in percentage In general it can be seen that the biggest proportion from male was managerial and profesional and the biggest percentage of F
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 63
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 67
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is calibrated in percentage. Overall, it clearly seen that in Japan, other goods ...
^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e second largest part of chart was 24%. While, the lowest contribution of all sectors...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...are. It got 6% of all major categories. As the highlighted in the pie chart of Mal...
^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Proportion
...Housing made up the biggest percentage. proportion of Housing in Malaysia was 34%. Differe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... % which was 26% for goods and service. While, the percentage of Health care im Malay...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01052631579 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77115230677 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468421052632 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2722866663 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.5 112.824112599 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.875 22.9334400587 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333160347171 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119652893189 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181188286473 0.0843802449381 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262298185202 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141931181876 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.89 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.