The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010
The given graphs compare online shopping in terms of four different categories in Canada in both 2005 and 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the shopping of video games and food and beverage were a dramatic increase from 2005 to 2010, while figures for both home furnishings and electronics and appliance fell significantly.
According to the graphs show, by 2005, the online sales for electronics and appliance sector were the most popular, reaching a peak at 35%, but then, these figures dropped by 5% in 2010. By contrast, the order rates of food online were lower than in 2005, just around 18%, before hitting the highest points of 32% in 2010.
On the other hand, the percentage of video game trading and food was similar in 2005, with 18 and 22 percent orderly. Over a period of 5 years, the online selling for video games rose slightly, stood at 23% by 2010. However, this figure for home furnishings fell by 10% at the same time
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-07-05 | jasmine.27 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Maju Chowdhury | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below shows the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 56
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education inBritain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where releva 73
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68072289157 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4105495266 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60843373494 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3799745668 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283970975866 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130059849054 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778048828229 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176740822643 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616398777589 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.