The pie charts illustrate the contribution of industry sectors to the Turkish economy over the course of 16 years, starting from 2016.
Overall, agriculture made up the majority of the economy of Turkey in 2000. Besides, healthcare and education were the highest percentages of the Turkish economy in the next 16 years. However, construction took up the lowest proportion in 2000 while the lowest figure on the chart in 2016 was for finance, business and other.
The percentage of agriculture’s contribution to the economy of Turkey rank first position, at 24% in 2000 and decreased to 14% over the following 16 years. Moreover, the similar trend could be seen in government, and leisure & hospitality, which accounted for 12%, and 17% respectively in 2000. The year 2016 witnessed a decline of 3% in these figures.
The contribution of construction hit a low of 3% in 2000. An upward trend to 10% was seen in this figure in 2016. In addition, manufacturing, and trade, utilities and transportation made contributions of 8%, and 14% respectively in 2000. Having the same trend, these figures experienced increases to 12%, and 16% respectively in 2016. Furthermore, the proportion of health and education contributing to the Turkish economy in the years 2000 and 2016 was equal to 17%.
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 89
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...een in this figure in 2016. In addition, manufacturing, and trade, utilities and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13744075829 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17070966605 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516587677725 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4717219142 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5833333333 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236422019786 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926525814451 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584703929636 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163953941272 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419485737064 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.