The given table presents information on the operational date, route length and the number of passengers in six underground railway systems.
While London enjoys the distinction of having the oldest railway system, Los Angeles has the most recent one. Paris and Tokyo railways were established in the first half of the twentieth-century while Washington and Kyoto’s railways became operational in the latter half of the century.
While London has the longest railway route, Kyoto has the smallest. Paris railway’s route is almost half of that of London. Tokyo rail has the route length of 155 kilometers and Washington DC has that of 126 kilometers.
Though Tokyo rail’s route length is less than half of the London rail, it carries 1927 million passengers per year, which is more than double of what London rail carries. Though Washington DC’s system has a length of 126 kilometers, it carries only 144 million passengers per annum, which is less than 10 percent of Tokyo’s rail passengers. Kyoto carries only 45 million passengers per annum, the least among the given systems.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- underground railway systems 61
- underground railway systems 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31818181818 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86931255625 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8082422903 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203903635008 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952564598789 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780197939406 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145447948823 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789270408168 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.