The following charts illustrate the proportion of education level in Glasgow city with respect to their age groups and gender in 2010.
Overall, people with university-level are high in number among all age groups, while people who had studied up to school level are deliberately less and people with no education remain stable up to certain age after it has risen to peak in the number.
In 2010, people who had studied up to university level are above 70% with the age of 16-24. Meanwhile, it shows a decreasing trend of 50% with the age of 50-75. Finally, it reduces to 25% regarding the age of 75 above. On the other hand, people with school level and no education remain relatively stable up to the age of 75 around 20% and 9% respectively. Further, it shows some fluctuations. people with school level decreased significantly to 3% and people with no education increases dramatically to 72%.
When comes to gender, women with no education hit a top position with 38%. Meanwhile, it reduces to 35% in the case of men. Both men and women studied up to school level are exactly 33%. There is 3% of a slight difference between men and women with no education.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- underground railway systems 56
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 67
- underground railway systems 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...y. Further, it shows some fluctuations. people school level decreased significantly to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71219512195 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72871787645 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49756097561 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.9257418753 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138700779103 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606015984367 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828244297163 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126356257313 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10646585433 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.