The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010.
The three charts illustrate the situation of the year 2010 about education in five age ranges, 16-24, 24-35, 35-50, 50-75 and 75+, both male and female, in Glasgow, a city of Scotland. Obvious is that most of the population aged between 16-50 attained a university degree, which is to say, Glasgow has a generally sound education level across the city.
To be more specific, four age ranges share the feature that the people with university degree take up the most part, with the only exception aged 75+. Older people tend to have on qualifications compared with younger citizens. Interestingly, the percentage of degree holders are at least 2.5 times as that of school certificate. In other words, graduates who finish their high school are more likely to acquire further education.
Beside, there is not much difference between different genders of all ages. Due to the aging population and the large portion of citizens with no certificates or degrees, non-qualification holders take up the biggest part of the whole. However, the gap is not impossible to fill, with less than 10 percent between any education levels.
In one word, Glasgow set a marvelous example for the rest of cities in Scotland in terms of educational development and gender equality.
- Is local history more important than world history when it comes to what our schoolchildren should learn in class? 67
- Number of marriages and divorces in the USA, 1970-2000 73
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, at least, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09615384615 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80426555901 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673076923077 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4464951631 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182073259288 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581999645651 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844362604763 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115086597651 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106105989055 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.