Long-Term International Migration, UK, 1999-2008
This line graph gives the information of UK’s long-term international migration from 1999-2008.
Overall, we can clearly tell from the line that the population of immigration and emigration in UK both increased about 260 thousand people over the past ten years.
In terms of the immigration to UK, it experienced two plateaus: from the period of 2000-2001 and 2002-2003. After that, a significant increase occurred from the year 2003 to 2004. In the following five-year span, the immigration population ebbed and flew, and the peak emerged in the year 2006, which was a 600-thousand population. And finally in 2008, it reached to the level of 595 thousand people.
As for emigration, the overall trend of it was increasing. It plateaued in the year 2002 to 2003. After met a peak in 2006, the number of emigrates from UK fall dramatically from 400 thousands to 350 thousands—the lowest point over the sex-year’s increase. And after that, it continues to increase.
To summarize, from the beginning, the increasing rate of both immigration and emigration acts in the similar way. In the 10-year span, the conditions of immigration and emigration changed irregularly. Overall, the trend of immigration and emigration was growing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-28 | brandey | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | brandey | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | V | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | Prabhjot Sanghera | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | Bijay thapa | 56 | view |
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 84
- Chart summarizing. 11
- Number of marriages and divorces in the USA, 1970-2000 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 78
- Long-Term International Migration, UK, 1999-2008 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32323232323 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19908733542 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540404040404 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3855228159 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0769230769 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2307692308 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.46153846154 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151266541101 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569519106389 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120853189487 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122700600856 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168410725042 0.0819641961636 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.