Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
As the modern medicine develops, animals have been involved in the medical experiments more frequently. And it has triggered a discussion on whether we should test a new drug or treatment on animals, such as pigs, mice and monkeys.
Generally, morality is why people would oppose these experiments. Critics deem animals’ suffering as abusing, which is morally wrong. People would never use human in medicine trail. But why does the animal have to go through all this while they have nothing to do with the benefits of the experiments. From my point of view, these people only see a part of the story.
I also have pity on for the suffering of the animals which are suffering. But,But what lies behind the phenomenon is the rule of the world. We are learning and developing as the leader of the planet, at the cost of other creatures, as every species do since the outset of history. Someone may differ: we have been the advanced and civilized ones,ones; therefore, we should not act brutally like a savage. Unfortunately, we have compromised interests of other animals on earth in different forms since we found ourselves the most powerful living form in the world. And medicine trail with living animals happens to be one of them, a direct one though. We invade animals’ residence and discharge poisonous fluid and gas into waters and air, fazing the ecological system and natural environment. The expanding of human’s living area and the evolution of technologies are the indirect, soft form of animals’ mishap. Stopping these sorts of experiments, from what I can see, can change little to the plight of the rest of the world.
What is more, sacrifices of animals may be the pivotal part of the medical advancement. A new drug or medical treatment that is controversial may never be put into use even if they are harmless to people and can save millions lives because the experiments are banned. In this case, sacrifices of mice could translate into the success of a drug, helping people in pain.
All in all, I am in favour of animal experiment, for the development of our society. However, we would never forget the animals that contributed their lives to us on the course of medical progress.
- Is local history more important than world history when it comes to what our schoolchildren should learn in class? 67
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 84
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of 78
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 89
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and waterconsumption in two different countries. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , But
... of the animals which are suffering. But,But what lies behind the phenomenon is the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ones
...ave been the advanced and civilized ones,ones; therefore, we should not act brutally ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90211640212 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81133795891 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534391534392 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0162692834 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2380952381 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27901695352 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776834666197 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443219935532 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149536399433 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295888509907 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.