Weekly earning of full-time graduate employees by type of degree and age
The graph illustrates information on the income per week of three types of graduates: higher degree, first degree and other credentials in 2002.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were considerable upward trends for both first degree and other degrees, whereas the earnings of higher degree went in the opposite direction. Another interesting point is that the wage of 21 to 15 for three levels was the lowest salary and the highest uptake belonged to graduates with other types of qualification at about the age of 36 to 40.
Looking at the details, other degrees had the highest uptake and higher degree had the second highest uptake in the group of 21 to 25, which were at more or less than 400. Conversely, the youngest age of first degree was the lowest, having remained at around 350. After that, there was a significant soar in 31 to 35 of three levels. Furthermore, 35 to 40 of others remained the most outstanding point throughout, at about 820.
Subsequently, despite other degrees saw a decline sizably from more than 800 to 710 in the age of 50, the figure then recovered to nearly 800 in the age 60. The earnings of higher and first degree fluctuated in the 40 to 46. From 50 to the end, the salary of a higher degree went down to less than 700, however, there was a slight rise in the wage of the first degree.
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors in thousands to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Weekly earning of full time graduate employees by type of degree and age 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, then, whereas, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1113.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58024691358 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50975505371 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497942386831 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6860566623 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201834409839 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842125771669 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521440342597 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133873818671 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336170474919 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.