Weekly earnings of full time graduate employees by type of degree and age

The line graph indicates weekly wages which belong to employees with different education degree at dissimilar ages in 2002.

As an overall, the main trend is that the weekly amaounts made by graduates remained stable relatively from the middle of thirties to the end of the fifties after a sharp increase up to 30s.

First noticeable point regarding graph is that all employees with dissimilar qualifications indicated some change ; a dramatic increment. As shown in the graph, the amaountof weekly salaries rose in a sharp way from the beginning of the middle of 30s for all degree. As an illustration, at the time that was mentioned, weekly wages which belong to higher and first degree ascended dramatically from around 350 pound to just over 600 pound.

After having given the firs key point, the second obvious trend with regard to grap is that all degrees stayed same level of money up to end of the 50s. Employees with first degree, for instance, earned just under 700 pound after end of the 30s.

Votes
Average: 6.9 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sharp way" with adverb for "sharp"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...aph, the amaountof weekly salaries rose in a sharp way from the beginning of the middle of 30s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...e ascended dramatically from around 350 pound to just over 600 pound. After having...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
... from around 350 pound to just over 600 pound. After having given the firs key poi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...ee, for instance, earned just under 700 pound after end of the 30s.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, for instance, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88372093023 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55244041129 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593023255814 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2040678434 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201017484598 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895442115215 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05396323817 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122968696223 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490986838038 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.