The line graph gives information about the proportion of female members of congress in different countries in Europe between 2000 to 2012.
Overall, it is clear that all nations saw a sharp increase in the quantity of women attending parliament. In addition, this rate in France was the lowest among 5 countries all the time survey.
In 2000, about 33% of members of congress were women in Germany compared with about 22% in Italia and 25% in Belgium. After 12 years, in 2012, there was a steady growth in the number of female members of national assembly in Germany, Belgium, Italia. The figure in Germany rose to approximately 37% while these rates in Belgium and Italia were lower, at 32%, 25% respectively.
On the other hand, the percentage of women attenders in parliament in UK was about 27%,about 22% higher than France's rate in 2000. In 2012, the figure in France rose to about 20,5%, four times higher than the rate in 2000. The figure in UK went up to about 39%, the highest proportion among 5 European countries.
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 100
- The graph below shows the changes in the place where people used to surf the internet in the years 1998 2000 2002 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 44
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010
- Some People believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviors Others disagree and think that host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both the views and provide your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...embers of congress were women in Germany compared with about 22% in Italia and 25...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74301675978 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54226162316 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.1369334592 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18204950093 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791203019485 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573851746598 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118372710786 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567101010428 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.