WRITING TASK 1:
THE PIE CHART BELOW SHOW THE AMOUNT OF ELECTRICITY GENERATED BY ENERGY SOURCE IN SCOTLAND FOR 20 YEARS AGO AND LAST YEAR.
The pie charts show how much electricity was generated by different types of energy sources in Scotland for 20 years ago and last year.
As it can be seen from both charts, there are some differences in the usage of renewable and non renewable energy sources. In fact, last year there was a decrease in regards to the amount of electricity generated by hydro pumped storage and hydro natural flow, compared to 20 years.
However, it appears to be a massive change in the amount of electricity generated by coal, gas and nuclear sources. Twenty years ago, people used to use more coal and gas than last year, even though the amount of nuclear energy is higher than 20 years ago.
Although a large number of differences can be spotted in both pie charts, there are also some similarities, especially related to the amount of gas used last year and 20 years ago. The percentage between them are pretty similar, ranging from 21.7% of gas used last year and 22.3% of 20 years ago.
In conclusion, despite a few similarities in the amount of electricity generated by gas, most of the amount of electricity generated in Scotland changes according to the energy source used both last year and 20 years ago.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-22 | Phạm Minh Trang | 82 | view |
| 2021-01-23 | mainagioia29 | 69 | view |
- WRITING TASK 1 THE PIE CHART BELOW SHOW THE AMOUNT OF ELECTRICITY GENERATED BY ENERGY SOURCE IN SCOTLAND FOR 20 YEARS AGO AND LAST YEAR 69
- It is generally believed that the Internet is an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not be the best place to find information 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...In fact, last year there was a decrease in regards to the amount of electricity generated by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 10, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... higher than 20 years ago. Although a large number of differences can be spotted in both pie ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73933649289 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56027712949 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473933649289 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5685460354 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.556213032825 0.215688989381 258% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.283080992685 0.103423049105 274% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184121743064 0.0843802449381 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.381887827427 0.15604864568 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161118409867 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...In fact, last year there was a decrease in regards to the amount of electricity generated by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 10, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... higher than 20 years ago. Although a large number of differences can be spotted in both pie ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73933649289 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56027712949 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473933649289 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5685460354 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.556213032825 0.215688989381 258% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.283080992685 0.103423049105 274% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184121743064 0.0843802449381 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.381887827427 0.15604864568 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161118409867 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.