WRITING TASK 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph below shows the amount in grams of potatoes, pasta and rice eaten in a European country between 1976 and 2006.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The graph chart shows the consumption quantity of potatoes, pasta and rice in a European state during the period of 30 years from 1976 to 2006. Overall, it is seen that the proportion of potatoes in a weekly diet has greatly reduced in the span of 30 years whereas intake of pasta has substantially increased during the same time period.
In 1976, the consumption of potatoes stood at the highest among the three food items. More than 400 grams of potatoes were consumed by a person in a week. Pasta was the least eaten product in that year (About 270 grams per person per week).
Initially until around 1986, potatoes were the most sought after food products. However, this trend got reversed and people started eating less amounts of potatoes thereafter. Especially after 1991, there was a steep decline of quantity of potatoes forming part of diet and in 2006; it was at the bottom position (little more than 100 grams per person per week).
In contrast to this trend, people started consuming more quantity of pasta and its quantity on weekly meals continued to increase until 1996 (reaching 500 grams per human per week) and thereafter, it has stabilised.
It can also be seen that the consumption of rice was declining until 2000 and thereafter it slightly peaked up. However, its consumption in 2006 (around 200 grams per person per week) was much less than in 1976 (little more than 300 grams per person per week).
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far out-weight the disadvantages.Do you agree or disagree?You should 67
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree 61
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Why is it important to learn a foreign language, and why do you think people learn another language? Give your views with examples. 56
- Write a letter to your manager about a computer system problem that you have encountered and say Describe the problem How it is affecting your work What needs to be done about it 87
Comments
the chart illustrates the
the chart illustrates the gram number consume of three kind of different foods in a European country from 1976 to 2006
It is clear from the chart that , the gram Number of pasta had a increased steadily while the amount of gram in rice and potatoes have a change were not certain
In 1976 , the gram number of potatoes reach the peak at about 410 , while the amount in gram
of rice was the secondly point at around 310 and the number of gram in pasta reach the bottom at about 250
It can see that , the potatoes and rice haven't consumption of certain in gram from about 1976 to 1988 ; moreover , the consumption of potatoes between 1988 and 2006 witness and downward trend and the number in gram of rice grow . Meanwhile , In pasta had a irregulare consumption form 1976 to 1986 and rised consumption between 1986 and 1996 ; however, the amount in gram of rice consumption was no chance from 1996 to 2006 . Specially , the number of gram in pasta and potatoes were equal in 1986
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun amounts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... got reversed and people started eating less amounts of potatoes thereafter. Especia...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, whereas, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76923076923 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38197099791 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514170040486 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.907063155 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.090909091 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114572261784 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054089938442 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534176879264 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0739511227516 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311626509537 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.